نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار دانشگاه علوم ومعارف قرآن کریم
2 گروه زبان و ادبیات عرب، کرمانشاه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمانشاه، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
DOR: https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22516026.1399.10.23.5.0
The evaluative studies of the fundaments for the interpretation of Hadiths, especially interpretive ones, serve to promote the science of interpretation and Hadiths on the basis of modern stylistic principles. Such studies help to eliminate the mistakes made in interpretation or plug the gaps of the interpretations at hand. Al-Forghan is a good example of how the Quran can be used to interpret Hadiths and vice versa. This is owing to the use of specific interpretation techniques in which the Quran is viewed as the base while the validity of Hadiths is not ruled out. Hadiths, if not in contrast to the Quran, can be considered valid. In this case, they are interpreted on the basis of textual, conceptual and referential pieces of evidence derived from the Quran. According to the author of Al-Forghan Interpretation, once there are several incongruent Hadiths, firstly, there is just one of them to inevitable pick as correct and, secondly, the surface structure and the semantics of the Quran should be preferred to those of that Hadith. In other words, in the case of several contradictory Hadiths on one subject, it is the overt features of the Quran that should be relied on to make distinctions among those Hadiths. The author of Al-Forghan rejects the interpretation of the Quranic verses solely on the basis of valid views as stated in Hadiths. The present study partly seeks to criticize this approach.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)